Laura and Joe. Credit: ABC
Okay, I’ll say up front that I did something I try not to do and read Tom and Lorenzo’s recap of this episode before writing mine. What can I say? I love their recaps, even before I was writing about something we were both watching. I think they were pretty fair with their assessment, as I thought along similar lines. You can read what they have to say about “Truth or Dare” by clicking the link above, but let’s get started on the Moniqueblog recap:
In this episode, we aren’t really flying to anywhere, even though we are. The crew flew to pick up some Navy men who were coming home from war (the Vietnam War, I suppose, since the timeline for the war, according to Wikipedia, is from Nov. 1, 1955 to April 30, 1975). The two storylines we’ve got going in this episode deal with the sisters, Kate and Laura. Kate is dealing with the CIA wanting her to turn her boyfriend Niko into a spy to gain intelligence about the Tito Regime in Yugoslavia, and she doesn’t want to lie to Niko in order for the CIA to use him as a pawn in their big game of chess. Meanwhile, Laura is grappling simultaneously with her own mild racism and attraction to a black Navy officer Joe.
Joe. Screencap: Me
Firstly, after looking at the official recap on ABC, I read a comment that is really accurate and I’m surprised I forgot about this egregious oversight. The commenter said that they thought they missed an episode since they didn’t see the Dean/Ginny thing addressed anymore, especially since Maggie ratted Ginny out to her employer/lover, the Pan Am executive. That should still be a storyline, not something that’s resolved, since it wasn’t resolved. Dean should be in the hot seat for this. He should be fired!
Anyway, this episode was actually not bad. On the back of “The Genuine Article,” it was rather good. I should save this for my upcoming post on what Pan Am‘s doing right and what it’s doing wrong, but I have to say that the main problem of this show is that it does not deal well with prolonged storylines. For some reason, the writers are wrapping up what should be episodes-long storylines in one episode, and most of the time, they are missing what could be great stories. The Dean/Ginny story could have been a great story, especially after Maggie tells the exec about it. That could give her some more characterization as the backstabbing Alexis Carrington-type and set up a dynamic where the whole crew feels like they have to gird their loins when around her for fear of her finding out some of their other secrets–like, in this episode, Laura reveals that she took nude photos. If Maggie is the Alexis Carrington-type, she could use that since it’s against regulations for Pan Am stewardesses to take such pictures while representing the brand. More on that later. As the show stands right now, it’s almost like the show is being treated like an episodic show instead of the overarching plotline show it’s trying to be. It’s trying to be both, when it can only be one or the other. Sure, one-off things can happen in each episode, as it does for overarching plotline shows, but there has to be some kind of cohesive “bigger picture” here. There isn’t one. Perhaps this is where Steve Maeda comes in, and maybe these five episodes that were ordered will show his vision for the show. (Eventually, I’ll write a bit on him to show how his expertise has been used on other shows and see how it will help out Pan Am.)
Laura’s characterization in this episode is interesting. On the one hand, it’s nice to see her say something that’s not completely something Gidget would say, but on the other hand, we are just hearing about it. We didn’t get an episode that shows Laura growing as a person due to hanging around Maggie. It’s only implied that because she’s moved in with Maggie, she’s doing some beatnik things that she wouldn’t normally do. I’m not saying I want to see Laura naked, but from a story perspective, it would have been nice to actually see some of this development instead of just hear about it. Just hearing about it doesn’t have a big effect on the audience other than they’ve learned something in a very dry, non-engaging way. We don’t get to see Laura go through some sort of thought process. Seeing the thought progress would have been nice.
However, we do see the thought process behind her conflicting feelings concerning Joe, and that was good. We get to see her lock her door, then unlock it, then lock it again, because she’s attracted to Joe and actually entertains the thought of him coming into her room, but she’s also aware of the stereotypes-passed-off-as-truths she probably heard about black people, especially black men, and decides to lock her door (but that probably also thrills her as well. This gets more complicated than the show would ever decide to go to, but I’m glad we at least saw some allusion to those ideas that are probably going on in her head). Even without the racism part, there’s just the standard human element of fear–this is a strange man that she’s alone with. I think any person might consider locking their door when someone they don’t know is staying over, and then feel guilty that they assumed the worst. The discriminatory stuff just adds another level to what is already an uncomfortable situation in the beginning.
Laura locking herself in her room for the night. Screencap: Me
Also good–which is something Tom and Lorenzo were so right to point out–is that this episode took place in NYC, a place that isn’t synonymous in American (and world?) culture with being racist. New York has racism, just like Birmingham; just look at Spike Lee’s Do the Right Thing. I think in the north, racism is sometimes hidden or perhaps even looked over (I say “looked over” because some people believe there’s actually no racism in the north and so they think it just can’t happen). Of course, the north didn’t have the degree of bombings and such like the south, but there’s different types of racism, all of it being bad. So for Joe to get punched for Laura holding his hand? I’d say it’s accurate. It’s good to show the other side of the racism equation.(BTW–If someone from the north wants to educate me on northern racism, feel free to leave a comment.)
It’s also good to see Laura finally coming to grips with her mental state and just deciding to forget racism altogether. Let me clarify–I don’t think she’s ever been a racist person to begin with; you can be a non-racist member of society and still hold erroneous thoughts about people from what you’ve been taught as a kid. I think she’s one of those people–basically, she’s just naive. This situation with Joe has allowed her to grow some as a person. Did he need to have his shirt off while she was pouring her heart out? No. That, coupled with her still having her clothes on, gave it shades of “black brute/black exoticism” in my eyes, and we didn’t need to go there. I guess you could say his shirt was off because his ribs and side got hurt, but most of the damage was done to the face. But I am fully supportive of this new development in Laura’s life and I hope the Laura/Joe angle is elaborated on in future episodes. I also hope that we get to see Ted’s reaction to it so we can finally get a concrete bead on just how racist he is. In any case, Laura/Joe is a GAZILLION TIMES BETTER than Laura/Ted. Ted’s a bit of a creepy jerk-off.
Relationship! Screencap: Me
And speaking of the fight, how did it exactly end? Why does this show cut away to commercial when we need an ending for something? Like, how did Laura and Maggie get out of the Brazilian jail after Ted couldn’t get them out during “The Genuine Article”? I don’t know because we cut to another storyline or the commercial.
I’ve written all about Laura and none about Kate. I was actually less affected by Kate’s story than I was Laura, even though Kelli Garner, the actress who portrays Kate, gave great emotion in this and actually got a chance to flex her acting muscle. I felt for her in the interrogation room when she was faced with an angry Niko, but all of the pathos we got from that scene evaporated when we got to the equally emotional final goodbye in the air terminal, because they were talking in code FOR NO REASON. How come they are talking in code when Kate and Richard never talk in code and they’re out in public spaces? She even yells while talking to him at one point! To me, the “speaking in code” part went on way too long. But the ending, seeing her pull herself together, was very well done.
Kate crying in the interrogation room. Screencap: Me
Will we see Joe again? I hope so. Laura’s got his memento, so I hope so. Will we see Niko again? I hope so, too. He’s a good character. Did Joe seriously have to be from the south? That’s debatable, but I, for one, being a black person from Birmingham, am personally tired of seeing the black southern person representing black people in the 1960s. It’s almost like a black southern person has become shorthand for “black 1960s person.” I understand why–most of the sixties were defined by what went on down here in the south, so I get why a lot of shows and films have black southern people when it comes to sixties period stories. However, not all black people from the sixties were from the south, and you don’t have to use black southerners (or southerners in general) in every racism story! In In The Heat of the Night, Virgil Tibbs lived in the north and was only in the south to visit relatives. Northern black people faced just as much junk as southern black people did. Probably varying degrees of it, since racism was extremely hardcore in the south, but northern black people had their fair share of getting angry due to unfair treatment. Of course, I’m not saying Joe can’t be from the south, but this “black southerner” thing has been done thousands of millions of times, and it’s getting cliche.
I also forgot to mention Colette. She and Dean finally had some interaction in this episode! However, I don’t think a pilot would let a stewardess fly a plane, even if he’s sitting there. She had the lives of veterans in her hands! However, there are some fathers (mine included) who put their young kids in their laps and allowed them to take the wheel of the car under their supervision. That’s still dangerous, but there you have it.
Anyway, I think my review turned out like Tom and Lorenzo said, in their review, how their review turned out–I sound harsher than I actually feel about the episode. With all of my griping, I do think this was a good episode. The show is hitting pockets of storytelling gold in spurts, but hopefully, this episode (as well as the last one) is the mark of the show finally gaining some traction.
Oh–I totally forgot about the Sanjeev Alert!
Sanjeev Alert–
Screencap: Me
The ‘Jeev was comic relief per usual, but he seemed more like a person this episode, even though he only got one line. He also got to get up from the cockpit along with Ted, something I also don’t think would be done on a plane. I’m no pilot, but I wouldn’t feel safe with everyone except the pilot in the cabin when they should be in the cockpit (with the exception of using the bathroom). Keep your butts in those seats, cockpit crew! However, it was neat to see him interact with someone as cool as Colette. Colette–look at HIM, not cardboard cutout Dean! The ‘Jeev is bound to be a million times more interesting as well as being a student of the world such as yourself! I’m projecting my own hopes onto Sanjeev’s character, but seriously, Colette. Do it. You had more chemistry with Sanjeev in this episode and you weren’t even talking to him.



















Excellent review of the Pan Am episode. Very spot on. I appreciate your comments re: northern racism. I grew up in Cleveland where there was/is indeed racist attitudes. People forget that even nowadays there are places where interracial relationships are frowned upon, and the couples are sometimes placed in harms way. I was one of those people back in the 1980s. Pan Am definitely has some rough edges and more than a few inaccuracies but overall I think it’s a good show and I hope it succeeds and remains on air for a long time. Also, I want to say I’m enjoying this blog overall and will be back to visit again.
Thanks, Sabrina! Glad to hear you liked both the article and the site! If you want to check out more of my Pan Am recaps, please check out the Pan Am recaps section of my site! I hope subsequent visits to my site will be just as good as the first!
Good review in that you are fair. I’ve read way too many comments that knock this show unnecessarily. Such as complaining about “undeveloped story lines” that need to be allowed time to develop or, gee, what would the writers do to tell stories? Some reviewers need to develop some restraint against their inner need for instant gratification.
I have one explanation that works for me as to Kate & Nicko’s use of “code” to talk in public. They know now (thanks to the recording) that the CIA is listening to them and what they want to say is just too personal for Richard and his “lynch mob” (Kate’s description) to take further advantage of. They, as a couple, need to be a little less vulnerable to the CIA. Let’s face it, Kate was horrified that a conversation she thought was in private at her apartment was recorded. Indeed, Richard knew all about it while he listened to Kate report to him about Nicko’s political feelings. Richard didn’t need Kate’s report but, let her give it as tho she was passing along information. So, hearing that recording made her face the reality that while she “thinks” she is serving the free world by helping the CIA, actually, she is being used. My hope is that this lesson is not lost on Kate and that her character shows a little less “naivete” when it comes to conducting espionage in the future. Stay angry at Richard, Kate!
Thanks, Chris! Also, thanks for the explanation for the code talk. That explanation does make a lot of sense and also provides better depth for the scene. Hopefully the writers were thinking of what you were thinking and expound on it in future episodes, as it would be nice to see Kate get a little wiser and less trusting of the CIA and realize that she needs to be on her guard at all times (and that has to include not yelling out your conversation to a CIA agent in a diner where everyone can eavesdrop on your conversation)!
I hope you stay tuned to my recaps and if you want to catch up on the recaps I’ve written thus far, please check out my Pan Am recaps page.
Hey , I think your reviews are so interesting and right on point. Also you present very good and fair viewpoints. I love the show too and like you I am a fan of Sanjeev! I love your Sanjeev alert section
anyways I found two emails for the heads of abc. I found it on the Pan Am Facebook page. If you want to email them too, that would be great. I think the way you talk about Sanjeev and the development of his character and where it should go would be worth emailing along with any other view points. Their emails are… Cathy.Rehl@abc.com , Patrick.K.Preblick@abc.com. All the best , looking forward to more reviews!
Thanks! I’m so glad you like the recaps! Also, thanks for the email addresses.
ted racists, i don;t know, maybe he knows about laura and joe,
maybe everyone in that episode saw them.
who knows, maybe ted might be in a relationship of his own, with some one of a different race.
laura and ted were both in harlem, and in haiti. so being around certain people like joe in the usa might be different.
maybe everyone on pan am saw them kissing, maybe laura and kate, and others know the stereotypes about joe and other people of color aren’t true.
i hope joe and laura get together.
Just a quick note on the lack of a Ginny resolution: That was going to be in “Romance Languages”, which was supposed to be the episode that preceded this one. But Sony pulled it at the last minute because they weren’t happy with how one of the storylines presented on screen (Colette and a young teen with a crush on her). Not only was the Ginny resolution there, but also Laura’s nude photo session (that was mentioned in this episode) and more development of the Kate/Niko storyline before he became a double-agent.
put sanjeev back on, niko and joe, and
colette’s friend from haiti. they were great special guest stars, i’d like to see again.
laura and joe really belong together.